By EDRi

Dear Members of the European Parliament,

We welcome the various statements by the EU to incorporate citizen’s interests within the
policy-making process for the Internet and we would like to draw your attention to some
serious concerns we have in respect to the Telecoms Package, which is about to enter the
Second Reading stage in the European Parliament.

Our concerns relate to those amendments to the Telecoms Package which affect the Internet
and Internet users. We welcome the Parliament’s support for users’ rights in First
Reading, and we urge you to build on that support to improve the texts in the Second Reading.

The Internet plays a major economic and social role, and contributes to European welfare.
It is a space for cultural exchange, technological innovation, and economic activity. It
empowers all citizens alike, including innovators, entrepreneurs and consumers. It enables
social interaction and democratic participation. It has become an important foundation for
culture, scientific research, innovation, and education.

Europe now has an opportunity to take a lead in the development of the next generation
networks, and the products, services, and applications that will run on them.

We note the Council Conclusions of 27 November 2008, on Future Networks and the Internet
(1) which state “that open and non-discriminatory access to the Internet should be
promoted in order to ensure effective competition and an innovation-friendly environment.”
Indeed, the Internet has grown very fast precisely because there was no discrimination
between traffic, based on content, services or applications.

European companies and operators, as well as users, have benefited greatly from this
development.

Open and non-discriminatory access is dependent on Internet users controlling their access
to content. This means users can access any website or internet service they want, at any
time, at the fastest speed they are willing to pay for. Users do not want network
operators to choose for them which websites and which services and applications they can
use. They want to be able to experiment with new applications and protocols without having
to ask for prior permission from the network operator. And they do not want content to be
blocked or restricted by the network operator.

We are concerned that certain amendments which remain in the Telecoms Package will put
those values and benefits, as well as fundamental rights such as privacy and freedom of
speech, in jeopardy. We have consistently stated, and we still believe, that it carries a
number of risks, namely that:

1. it will permit the filtering of content, applications and services – Universal Services
Directive, Article 22(3).

2. the denial of access to on-line copyright material through attempts at enforcement,
even when access is lawful, via “cooperation” between network providers and “the sectors
interested in the promotion of lawful content”- Universal Services Directive, Articles
33(3), 20(1.b.1st), 21(4a); and Framework Directive, Article 8(4g).

3. the threat to user’s privacy via the retention and processing of personal data for
“security purposes” – E-privacy directive, Article 6(7).

We request that the amendments related to the three aforementioned risks are removed from
the Package, in order that they may be given due consideration without delaying the wider
objectives.

At the same time,

1. Safeguards for users against discriminatory practices, disproportionate sanctions or
unfair restriction of service have been removed – Framework Directive Article 8 (4ga) and
Universal Services Directive Article 32a.

2. Regulatory controls on the activities of the service providers, which would protect
against discriminatory, restrictive or unfair practices, have been weakened – Universal
Services Directive, Article 22(3).

We believe that those safeguards and regulatory controls should be reinstated, in order to
ensure the fair treatment of users across Europe.

We recognise the critical nature of the overriding objective of the Telecoms Package,
namely to complete the internal market for telecommunications in Europe.

We would warn however, that the Telecom Package amendments on filtering, cooperation and
traffic processing will have in fact the effect of further distorting the internal market
and most of all, compromise user’s rights (which should be taken into account in defining
and implementing any Community policies and activities).

We very much share the desire of the EU to promote the growth and competitiveness of the
European economy, as we recognise that such growth will only be beneficial for all citizens.

However we believe that the measures to achieve that goal might not be detrimental to
citizen’s rights and democratic participation. We also believe that European welfare will
only happen if the Internet can remain free and open and that the type of measures
entailed in the Telecommunications package highlighted above will not contribute to
Europe’s economic objectives.

For these reasons, We request the Parliament rejects (2):

Universal Services Directive.
Article 22(3),
Article 33(3),
Article 20(1b.1st), and
Article 21 (4a).
E-privacy Directive.
Article 6(7)

and we request support for (3):
Framework Directive
Art. 8.4(ga), (Amendment 138),
Universal Services Directive
Art. 32a, (Amendment 166).

The undersigned groups and individuals represent thousands of European citizens and
Internet users, in EU member states.
Within our coalition we have experts in areas relevant to the Internet and citizens’
rights including filtering, network technologies, digital rights management, privacy and
data protection, policy, law, media and software. We would like to assist the European
Parliament in order to address the very important public policy areas related to the
Internet, telecommunications, privacy and copyright, and find equitable solutions for
business and for citizens.

Original text at
http://www.co-ment.net/text/711/

The undersigned,
EDRi and IT-Pol.dk.- Niels Elgaard Larsen
EBLIDA.- Andrew Cranefield
ISOC-ECC.- Christopher Wilkinson
La Quadrature du Net.- Jérémie Zimmermann
ScambioEtico.- Paolo Brini
AK Vorratsdatenspeicherung.- Ralf Bendrath
Free Knowledge Institute.- Wouter Tebbens
Föreningen fri kultur & programvara.- Jonas Öberg
e-frontier Bulgaria.- Bogomil Shopov
Center for Media and Communication Studies (CMCS).- Laura Ranca
P2P Foundation.- Celia Blanco and Michel Bauwens
eXgae.- Simona Levi
Istituto per le Politiche dell’Innovazione.- Guido Scorza
Altroconsumo.- Marco Pierani
NNSquad Italia.- Vittorio Bertola
FoeBuD.- Florian Glatzner
Asociación de Internautas.- Víctor Domingo
Associazione per il Software Libero.-Marco Ciurcina
Hispalinux. -Jorge Fuentes
EFFI. -Tapani Tarvainen

References
(1) Council Conclusions on future networks and the internet 2907th TRANSPORT,
TELECOMMUNICATIONS and ENERGY Council meeting Brussels, 27 November 2008

(2) Articles refer to the Council Common position adopted on 16 February 2009 – Universal Service Directive (DIRECTIVE 2002/22/EC) Article 22(3)
Universal Services Directive, (DIRECTIVE 2002/22/EC) Article 33(2a), Article 20(2b), Article 21 (4a), E-privacy Directive, (Directive 2002/58/EC) Article 6(6a)
Universal Services Directive (DIRECTIVE 2002/22/EC) Article 22(3)

(3) Amendments refer to 1st reading in European Parliament – Framework Directive, (DIRECTIVE 2002/21/EC) Amendment 138
Universal Services Directive (DIRECTIVE 2002/22/EC) Amendment 166.