By EDRi

On 25 April 2013, the European Commission invited all interested parties
to comment on Google’s proposed commitments to meet the Commission’s
concerns formally drafted in March 2013 regarding to Google’s four types
of businesses that might violate EU antitrust rules prohibiting the
abuse of a dominant position.

The Commission has concerns that Google might abuse its dominant
position on the market by a favourable treatment of links to Google’s
own specialised web search services as compared to links to competing
specialised web search services. The practices under discussion are:

– the use without consent of original content from third party web sites
in Google’s specialised web search services;
– the agreements that oblige third party web sites (“publishers”) to
obtain all or most of their online search advertisements from Google;
– contractual restrictions on the transferability of online search
advertising campaigns to rival search advertising platforms;
– the management of such campaigns across Google’s Adwords and rival
search advertising platforms.

In response, Google has made proposals to try to address the
Commission’s concerns. The proposals are now offered by the Commission
for consultation and comments may be made during a month. The Commission
will take the comments into account in its analysis, and in case it
reaches the conclusion that Google’s proposals address the four
competition concerns, it may adopt a decision to make them legally
binding on Google. Even if there is no proof of infringement of EU
antitrust rules, if the company breaks such commitments, the Commission
can impose a fine of up to 10% of its annual worldwide turnover.

Google proposes, for a 5-year period, for the European Economic Area:
– to label promoted links to its own specialised search services so that
users can distinguish them from natural web search results, clearly
separating these promoted links from other web search results by clear
graphical features (such as a frame);
– to display links to three rival specialised search services close to
its own services, in a clearly visible place for users;
– to offer all websites the option to opt-out from the use of all their
content in Google’s specialised search services, providing at the same
time that any opt-out does not negatively affect the ranking of those
web sites in Google’s general web search results;
– to offer all specialised search web sites focusing on product search
or local search the option to mark certain categories of information so
that such information is not indexed or used by Google;
– to provide a mechanism allowing newspaper publishers to control the
display of their content in Google News, on a web page per web page basis;
– to stop including in its agreements any written or unwritten
obligations that would require publishers to source online search
advertisements exclusively from Google;
– to stop imposing obligations preventing advertisers from managing
search advertising campaigns across competing advertising platforms.

Some opinions on Google’s proposals are already critical, explaining
that the proposals are too little and come too late:
“While the three competitive links are likely to drive some traffic to
Google alternatives, from a user experience standpoint this is not the
radical change I was imagining. In addition there’s apparently no
requirement or constraint around where Google can put universal search
results on the page. In other words, it can still show products, maps,
flight search and so on, where it likes,” says Search Engine Land
contributing editor Greg Sterling.

“Labelling results will do little or indeed nothing to prevent Google
from manipulating search results and discriminating against competing
services. It may even shepherd consumers towards clicking on Google
services now highlighted in a frame. Labelling should not be the sole
solution…The proposal to display links to three rival specialised
services raises the natural question of who decides the promotional
criteria. If that is Google, it leaves too much discretion in their lap
while most importantly, not solving the problem of non-discriminatory
choices for consumers,” was the statement of BEUC, the European Consumer
Organisation.

Anyone can send the Commission observations on the commitments proposed
by Google. The deadline to send the observations to the Commission is
one month from publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

EC press Release – Antitrust: Commission seeks feedback on commitments
offered by Google to address competition concerns (25.04.2013)
http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-371_en.htm

CE memo – Commission seeks feedback on commitments offered by Google to
address competition concerns – questions and answers
http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-383_en.htm

Roundup of Comments on Google’s Proposed Commitments to European
Commission (25.04.2013)
http://www.fairsearch.org/deceptive-display/roundup-of-comments-on-googles-proposed-commitments-to-european-commission/

Google’s commitments: too little, too late? (25.04.2013)
http://www.i-comp.org/blog/2013/googles-commitments-too-little-too-late/