Irish ISP settled to introduce 3 strikes

By EDRi · February 11, 2009

(Dieser Artikel ist auch in deutscher Sprache verfügbar)
The case introduced by IRMA (Irish Recorded Music Industry) against Irish
ISP Eircom through which Eircom was required to block P2P filesharing by
applying a filtering system to its network, was settled outside the court
room. The music industry decided to drop the action provided Eircom
introduces a “three strikes” system where users accused of filesharing by
the industry would be disconnected after two warning letters.

Eircom is pleased with the settlement as it does not risk breaching privacy
laws by providing to the music industry details about its subscribers and
because it does not have to add software to its network that might
interfere with its broadband service. Acording to the settlement, the record
companies will provide Eircom with the IP addresses of persons they detect
to illegally upload or download copyright works. Based on this information,
basically, the three steps the ISP has to take are:

1) to inform its subscribers that their IP address has been detected
infringing copyright;
2) to warn the respective subscriber that he (she) will be disconnected
unless the infringement ceases and
3) in case of non-compliance by the above warned subscriber, the respective
subscriber will be disconnected.

According to EDRi-member Digital Rights Ireland, this agreement is wrong
from many points of view: it is unreliable, secret, undemocratic and
disproportionate. First of all, MediaSentry, the company used by the music
industry until now to identify filesharers is a company which has been
recently found as operating illegally in several US states and that has a
track record of false accusations. Although the music industry has turned to
Danish firm Dtecnet, the process is still unreliable. The settlement is also
private to the parties and the music industry and Eircom will be the only
ones to decide, judge and execute. It is also undemocratic because the
3-strikes model was not discussed like in other European countries with
public input through public consultation and legislatures. And it is
disproportionate as with the present extent of the Internet, third innocent
parties may be affected in the process as Internet connections are not
generally unique to an individual.

The agreement is also bad news for Eircom’s customers who will not
be able to take action when accused of an infringement. Three accusations
from a group of third parties will be enough to terminate an Internet
connection. What it will also happen is that Eircom will have to modify its
terms of service for all its current customers without providing a legal
basis for a unilateral change of contract.

The three strikes process in this case is procedurally unfair. The music
industry has tried to gain some points realizing this may be its only hope
as automatic filtering and suing customers would not work.

The record companies represented in the case, EMI, Sony, Universal and
Warner, have agreed to take “all necessary steps” to get similar agreements
with all ISPs in Ireland. It remains to see whether other ISPs will defend
better their users’ rights.

Internet users face shutdown over illegal music downloads (29.01.2009)

Three unproven accusations and you’re out – why the Eircom / IRMA deal is
bad for internet users (29.01.2009)

Irish ISP Agrees to Three Strikes Against Its Customers (28.01.2009)

Ireland: Copyright Filtering Case Settles out of Court (29.01.2009)

“Three strikes” for Ireland – Eircom, music industry settle filtering case

EDRIgram – Ireland: Music industry sues ISP, demands filtering (12.03.2008)