ENDitorial: European Privacy Association – good, bad or simply misunderstood?
This article is also available in:
Deutsch: [ENDitorial: Die European Privacy Association – gut, böse oder einfach nur falsch verstanden? | https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.10_ENDitorial_Die_European_Privacy_Association?pk_campaign=edri&pk_kwd=20130530]
The European Privacy Association, after being caught out for failing to
respect the rules of the European Transparency Register, has issued a
defence of its actions. An article published by IDG News Service
describes Google, Microsoft and Yahoo as the “secret backers” of the
organisation. The EPA, in its defence, explains that it is a
“small organisation”, with a budget of 50 000 to 100 000 Euro.
Furthermore, it is “primarily” a voluntary association.
As a “small” organisation, it has major corporations paying at least ten
thousand Euro to it. This money is used to ensure the services of a
former Member of the European Parliament and an Italian lobbying company
(Competere). That lobbying company’s personnel overlaps with that of the
US lobbying organisation DCI Group. DCI Group lobbying specialism is
using “3rd party organisations” to “re-frame” issues and define them in
“more favourable terms”. This sounds more than a little like the
European Privacy Association.
As a “small organisation”, that has used the services of both Competere
and DCI Group, the EPA has managed to run an impressive number of plush
lunches and breakfasts in the European Parliament. This year alone,
*21 January 2013: lunch with conservative (EPP) parliamentarian Sean Kelly on profiling;
*20 February 2013: lunch with conservative parliamentarian Lara Comi on data transfer in the cloud;
*16 March 2013: breakfast with conservative (EPP) parliamentarian Axel Voss on data transfer to third countries;
*11 April 2013: breakfast with Green parliamentarian Jan-Philipp Albrecht on consent.
The companies behind the European Privacy Association also appear to be
making something of a habit of accidentally failing to disclose all
relevant information in the Transparency Register. Only last year, an
e-mail was sent by the “Initiative for a Competitive Marketplace”
(iCOMP) to Members of the European Parliament. The e-mail included a
transparency register number. However, the number was not that of iCOMP
but of lobbying company Burston Marsteller, whose transparency register
entry provided no reference at all to iCOMP. In reality, Microsoft was
instrumental in setting up iCOMP and Burston Marsteller also represents
Microsoft. As a result of a complaint to the Transparency Register,
changes were made that were considered satisfactory by the Transparency
Register secretariat and no sanctions were imposed.
Google, Microsoft and Yahoo are secret backers behind European Privacy
Complaint against EPA (15.05.2013)
EPA Press Statement (17.05.2013)
Microsoft Funding Anti-Google Trade Group Since 2007 (6.12.2010)
(Contribution by Joe McNamee – EDRi)