Set backs for Danish and Norwagian anti-piracy groups

By EDRi · November 18, 2009

This article is also available in:
Deutsch: [Rückschlag für dänische und norwegische Anti-Piraterie-Gruppen | http://www.unwatched.org/node/1593]

The Danish Antipiratgruppen representing the movie and music industries has
recently announced it gives up attempts to sue alleged copyright infringers
following several defeats in court.

“It requires very strong and concrete evidence to have these people
convicted. We simply could not lift the burden of proof,” stated
Antipiratgruppen lawyer Mary Fredenslund explaining the group’s decision.

Out of the four cases of alleged illegal downloading brought before the High
Court in one year, three trials have resulted in the defendants being
acquitted due to insufficient evidence. The forth trial led to the
conviction of the file-sharer only because the defendant confessed the deed.
Besides these cases, according to defense attorney Per Overbeck, cases
against two of his clients have been dropped in recent years as well.
“Antipiratgruppen has acknowledged that they can not get people convicted
without either catching them in the act or threatening them to confess.
(…) In practice, this means that without a confession there is no case,”
said Overbeck.

A recent Government report from the Ministry of Culture supports the idea
that it is practically impossible to get somebody sentenced for illegal
file-sharing in Denmark. According to the report, only the Internet
subscriber can be identified by an IP-addresses and not the person who
actually downloads the files. The courts have ruled several times that an
IP-address alone is not sufficient as evidence to prove the guilt.

In one of the trials, a computer forensics investigator admitted that any
ISP account could have multiple users in the same household and could have
other unauthorized 3rd-party users if a wireless router was compromised. He
testified that a court order might be required in order to identify the
individual that actually performed the deed.

Also, in Norway, The Pirate Bay has finally a break as the Norwegian court
rejected on 6 November 2009 the call from the entertainment industry to
force ISP Telenor to block its customers from accessing The Pirate Bay.

IFPI, backed by several Hollywood movie companies, has earlier this year
given Telenor an ultimatum to block users from accessing The Pirate Bay
within a 14 day-period or face legal action and sued the company which
refused to comply.

The court decision says that Telenor and other ISPs in Norway cannot be held
liable for copyright violations that arise from illegal downloads and that a
decision to block websites should better be taken by the Norwegian
authorities.

Ragnar Kårhus from Telenor said in a statement: “it is important for us to
emphasize that this case is not about being in favor of or opposed to
copyright, but about whether or not it is reasonable to saddle Internet
service providers with a censorship role in respect of content on the
Internet.” He added that in order to maintain steady, healthy revenues,
IFPI and other rights holders should develop business models and services
that may compete with sites like The Pirate Bay.

Anti-Piracy Group Throws in the Towel, Pirates Walk Free (7.11.2009)
http://torrentfreak.com/anti-piracy-group-throws-in-the-towel-pirates-walk-free-091107/

AFACT v iiNet: Day 6 – IP Address Alone Is Not Enough (13.10.2009)
http://torrentfreak.com/afact-v-iinet-day-6-ip-address-alone-is-not-enough-091013/

Norway court snubs call to block The Pirate Bay (6.11.2009)
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5j8PR7Xf0rC4GgxguVpBJK_LhBqOw

IFPI Loses: Telenor Will Not Block The Pirate Bay (6.11.2009)
http://torrentfreak.com/ifpi-loses-telenor-will-not-block-the-pirate-bay-091106/