Open letter: Protecting digital rights and freedoms in the Legislation to effectively tackle child abuse
EDRi is one of 52 civil society organisations jointly raising our voices to the European Commission to demand that the proposed EU Regulation on child sexual abuse complies with EU fundamental rights and freedoms. You can still add your voice now!
52 civil society organisations jointly raised our voices to the European Commission to demand that the proposed EU Regulation on child sexual abuse complies with EU fundamental rights and freedoms.
Tackling the online dissemination of child sexual abuse and exploitation material (CSAM) is an important part of the broader global fight to protect young people from sexual abuse and exploitation. In particular, this fight requires a comprehensive approach by governments and companies to prevent such egregious crimes before they happen. In the context of the upcoming EU legislation to effectively tackle child abuse, we urge the Commission to ensure that people’s private communications do not become collateral damage of the forthcoming legislation.
As the shocking events of past weeks have emphasised, privacy and safety are mutually reinforcing rights. People under attack depend on privacy-preserving technologies to communicate with journalists, to coordinate protection for their families, and to fight for their safety and rights. Equally in peacetime, people’s ability to communicate without unjustified intrusion – whether online or offline – is vital for their rights and freedoms, as well as for the development of vibrant and secure communities, civil society and industry.
We, the undersigned 52 organisations, strongly believe that we need to work together to find long-term solutions to the dissemination of CSAM online which are based in evidence and are respectful of all fundamental rights and the rule of law:
European Digital Rights (EDRi) (International)
ApTI (Romania)
ARTICLE 19 (International)
Associação Portuguesa para a Promoção da Segurança da Informação (Portugal)
Big Brother Watch (UK)
Bits of Freedom (The Netherlands)
Centre for Democracy & Technology (CDT) (International)
Chaos Computer Club (CCC) (Germany)
Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) (International)
Cryptoparty Köln-Bonn (Germany)
Data Rights (The Netherlands / European)
dataskydd.net (Sweden)
Defend Digital Me (UK)
Derechos Digitales (International)
Deutscher Anwaltverein (DAV) (Germany)
Deutsche Vereinigung für Datenschutz (DVD) (Germany)
DieDatenschützerRheinMain (Germany)
Digitalcourage (Germany)
Digitale Gesellschaft (Germany)
Državljan D/Citizen D (Slovenia)
EURAFRI Networking (International)
European Federation of Journalists (European)
Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) (International)
Electronic Frontier Finland (Effi)
Electronic Frontier Norway (EFN)
Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) (United States)
Entropia (Germany)
European Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ECNL)
European Sex Workers’ Rights Alliance (ESWA)
Foundation for Information Policy Research (FIPR) (UK / European)
Global Voices (the Netherlands / International)
Global Forum for Media Development (International)
Giordano Bruno Foundation (Germany)
Homo Digitalis (Greece)
Internet Society Catalan Chapter (ISOC-CAT) (European)
Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) (Ireland)
ISOC Brazil – Brazil Chapter of the Internet Society (Brazil)
IT-Pol Denmark
LGBT Technology Partnership (International)
Ligue des droits humains (Belgium)
Mnemonic (Germany / International)
Open Governance Network for Europe
Open Rights Group (ORG) (UK)
pEp Foundation (Switzerland)
Privacy and Access Council of Canada
Privacy International (PI)
Ranking Digital Rights (International)
SaveTheInternet (Germany)
StopACTA2 (Poland)
Tech for Good Asia
TOPIO – public space for privacy (Germany)
Vrijschrift.org (The Netherlands)
Please note that this letter was originally published on 17 March 2022 with 35 signatory organisations, and has been updated to reflect the additional signatures that also joined, reaching a total of 52. As the European Commission has now put forward their legislative proposal, this letter has now been superceded by a more recent civil society letter calling to withdraw the proposed CSA Regulation.