By Guest author

Shadow Regulations are voluntary agreements between companies (sometimes described as codes, principles, standards, or guidelines) to regulate your use of the internet, often without your knowledge.

04_shadow_regulation

Shadow Regulation has become increasingly popular after the monumental failure of restrictive internet laws such as Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and PROTECT IP Act (PIPA). This is because Shadow Regulation can involve restrictions that are as effective as any law, but without the need for approval by a court or parliament. Indeed, sometimes Shadow Regulation is even initiated by government officials, who offer companies the Hobson’s choice of coming up with a “voluntary” solution, or submitting to government regulation.

----------------------------------------------------------------- Support our work with a one-off-donation! https://edri.org/donate/ -----------------------------------------------------------------

Shadow Regulation is used in many different contexts, including copyright enforcement, regulation of “hate speech”, and to restrict sales of lawful products, among others. What’s wrong with these agreements? The crux of the problem is that they can quietly reshape our internet without our knowledge or input. We weren’t consulted during their development, don’t know how they are being applied, and typically have little or no means of recourse when they are used to shut down our speech online.

This doesn’t mean that voluntary agreements with internet companies are always a bad thing. Such agreements can be a positive way to avoid heavy-handed and inflexible regulation, and there are ways of reaching such agreements in an inclusive, balanced, and accountable way.

But although voluntary agreements can be done right, more often Shadow Regulation is deliberately exclusive and opaque, resulting in private parties acting as the internet police to enforce content removal or the restriction of online behaviour, while elected governments avoid responsibility. That’s both unfair and undemocratic.

This article was originally published by EDRi member EFF on https://www.eff.org/issues/shadow-regulation.

Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
https://www.eff.org/issues/acta

SOPA/PIPA: Internet Blacklist Legislation
https://www.eff.org/issues/coica-internet-censorship-and-copyright-bill

Shadow Regulation: the Back-Room Threat to Digital Rights (29.09.2016)
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/09/shadow-regulation-back-room-threat-digital-rights

Fair Processes, Better Outcomes (30.09.2016)
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/09/fair-processes-better-outcomes

Free speech – only as strong as the weakest link
https://www.eff.org/free-speech-weak-link

Beyond regulation: Reaching solutions that work for users
https://www.eff.org/files/2016/09/27/beyond-regulation-info-2.pdf

(Contribution by EDRi member EFF, international)

EDRi-gram_subscribe_banner

Twitter_tweet_and_follow_banner