Policy makers are working on the largest internet filter we’ve ever seen. An algorithm will decide which of your uploads will be seen by the rest of the world and which won’t. But filters often fail. Do you think there will be a way for internet users to object when their content is wrongfully blocked? Think again.
Internet filters will inevitably make mistakes and wrongfully block uploads. That’s why the proposal includes a redress mechanism. Sounds good, right? If your article or meme doesn’t make it through the filters, you can just contact the platform and get it sorted out. Or perhaps even explain why, in your case, the filter should make an exception. Unfortunately, that’s not how things are going to go down.
Unblocking content doesn’t undo the harm
First of all: a decision to unblock your content can easily take weeks. Meanwhile, a lot can happen, and the moment you waited for to post your article or meme, the moment that was just right, will have passed. If the complaint procedure works, that’s great, but often it will be too little, too late.
Users will play it safe – and censor themselves
Secondly, filing a complaint isn’t straightforward. At the very least you’ll probably have to identify yourself and go to great lengths to explain – and prove – why your upload should have been accepted. Who wants to spend their time jumping through legal hoops, just to upload that one (legal!) video? You’ve got better things to do. So next time you make a video, you might do it without including certain footage, or a particular quote. The internet filter won’t stop you from making video’s, but it will slowly chip away at your sense of freedom.
Platforms will abide by their terms of service, not the law
Finally, the complaint procedure will only be available to you if your content was taken down on the basis of the law. However, it is much more likely that your content will be blocked because it breeches the terms of service of the platform. Because in order to minimise risk, and make blocking less time-consuming, platforms will expand the scope of their terms of service to be able to delete any content or any account for any reason. That will leave you with no right to complain – even if your content was perfectly legal.
What can you do?
The following weeks are crucial. Call, tweet or e-mail your representatives that are part of the European Parliament’s Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI). On 20-21 June they will be deciding on the upload filter. Use the hashtag #CensorshipMachine or #FilterFail and let your representatives know you’re against the internet filter (Article 13)!
We’ve written some tweets to inspire you, but feel free to compose your own!
- .@MEP Stand up for our freedom of expression online. Please oppose the #censorshipmachine in the #copyright Directive proposal.
- .@MEP Stand up for our privacy online. Please oppose the #censorshipmachine in the #copyright Directive proposal.”
- .@MEP Show that you care about culture and free speech: oppose the #censorshipmachine in the #copyright Directive proposal.”
- .@MEP Internet filters don’t work. Please delete article 13 of the #copyright Directive proposal! #filterfail
Coordinated calls against the Censorship Machine (30.05.2018)
Save Your Internet
We already tweeted at MEPs in their own language, check it out.
Time to stop the #CensorshipMachine: NOW! – Members of the Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI)