Terrorist Content Regulation: Document Pool
Although the fear of the general public of terrorist attacks certainly puts considerable pressure on policy makers, politicians also strategically use the climate of diffuse anxieties to increase the securitisation of the internet and present themselves as capable, tough leaders.
Terrorist networks have grown highly prone to the use of the internet for spreading their propaganda and recruiting followers in recent years. Although the fear of the general public of terrorist attacks certainly puts considerable pressure on policy makers, politicians also strategically use the climate of diffuse anxieties to increase the securitisation of the internet and present themselves as capable, tough leaders. The latest example of such election-motivated policy making is the proposal for a Regulation on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online, with which the European Commission continues its trend of producing a watershed of “solutions” to terrorist propaganda on the internet.
The proposal contains three main measures to address alleged “terrorist” content:
- First, it creates orders issued by (undefined) national authorities to remove or disable access to illegal terrorist content within an hour.
- Second, competent authorities can choose to make referrals of terrorist-related potential breaches of companies’ terms of service that would be subject to the voluntary consideration of the companies themselves.
- Third, it legislates on (undefined) proactive measures that can lead to an authority requesting a general monitoring obligation.
A major concern for the functioning and freedom of the internet is the extension of the upload filter regime the EU is currently about to introduce for copyright to terrorist content. Requiring internet companies to monitor everything we say on the web does not only have grave implications for the freedom of speech, but it also follows a dangerous path of outsourcing and privatising law enforcement.
EDRi followed the developments of the Terrorist Content Regulation closely and critically and provided input to policy makers to ensure that human rights are fully respected in the proposal for the past three years. Unfortunately, the Regulation, which still includes very dangerous measures, was adopted by the Council in March 2021 and the European Parliament on 29 April 2021. It will apply from 7 June 2022.
EDRi’s analysis and recommendations
Legislative documents
EDRi’s blogposts and press releases
Other
Key Policy Makers
EDRi’s analysis and recommendations:
- EDRi Amendments on the proposal for a Regulation to prevent the dissemination of terrorist content online (16.01.2019)
- Recommendations for the European Parliament’s Draft Report on the Regulation on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online (December 2018)
- How-to: Fundamental rights-compliant removal orders in the Terrorist Content Online Regulation, Policy Briefing (28.10.2020)
Legislative documents:
- Regulation Of The European Parliament And Of The Council on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online (12.09.2018)
- Commission Impact Assessment on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council
on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online (12.09.2018) - Council General Approach on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online (03.12.2018)
- European Parliament’s position:
- Committee Opinions:
- LIBE Draft Report
- Amendments 36 – 178 (.doc) (25.02.2019)
- Amendments 179 – 359 (.doc) (25.02.2019)
- Amendments 348 – 741 (.doc) (25.02.2019)
- LIBE Compromise Amendments (.pdf) (05.03.2019)
- LIBE Compromise Amendments (.pdf) (04.04.2019)
- Voting list for the vote in 1st reading in Plenary on 17 April 2019 and related AMs (16.04.2019).
- Results of the votes in Plenary on 17.04.2019 : Roll call votes (pager 87-122) and Voting List (page 16, item 30) (18.04.2019)
- European Parliament Draft Report – Provisional text (.pdf)
- IMCO Draft Opinion
- IMCO Amendments 98-403 (.doc)
- CULT Draft Opinion
- CULT Amendments (22.02.2019). See AMs 53-173 (.doc) and 174-415 (.doc)
- CULT adopted Opinion (13.03.2019)
- LIBE Draft Report
- Committee Opinions:
EDRi’s blogposts and press releases:
- European Parliament confirms new online censorship powers (29.04.2021)
- Coalition of human rights and journalist organisations express concerns for free speech (25.03.2021)
- EU Terrorist Content Online Regulation Could Curtail Freedom of Expression across Europe (Media Diversity) (03.02.2021)
- Terrorist Content Online: Is this the end? (16.12.2020)
- EU: German Presidency Proposal for Terrorist Content Online Regulation fails to protect freedom of speech (14.10.2020)
- 59% of polled EU citizens decry anti-terror upload filters. You should too. (21.09.2020)
- Blind faith in technology diverts EU efforts to fight terrorism (EurActiv) (29.04.2020)
- Trilogues on terrorist content: Upload or re-upload filters? Eachy peachy (17.10.2019)
- Terrorist Content Regulation: Successful “damage control” by LIBE Committee (08.04.2019)
- FRA and EDPS: The Terrorist Content Regulation requires improvement for fundamental rights (20.02.2019)
- Civil Society Letter on the Terrorist Content Database (05.02.2019)
- Terrorist Content: LIBE Rapporteur’s Draft Report lacks ambition (25.01.2019)
- CULT: Fundamental rights missing in the Terrorist Content Regulation (21.01.2019)
- Terrorist Content: IMCO draft Opinion sets the stage right for EP (18.01.2019)
- Terrorist Content Regulation: Warnings from the UN and the CoE (19.12.2018)
- The EU Council’s general approach on Terrorist Content Online proposal: A step towards pre-emptive censorship (11.12.2018)
- Terrorist content regulation – prior authorisation for all uploads? (21.11.2018)
- The TERR Committee votes on its irreparable draft Report (21.11.2018)
- EU’s flawed arguments on terrorist content give big tech more power (24.10.2018)
- EU Parliament’s anti-terrorism draft Report raises major concerns (10.10.2018)
- Joint Press Release: EU Terrorism Regulation – an EU election tactic (12.9.2018)
- Anatomy of a Commission press campaign. Case study: Terrorist Content Regulation (11.9.2018)
- ENDitorial: The European Commission is talking “tough on terror”. Again. (29.08.2018)
- ENDitorial: Draconian anti-terrorism measures instil terror (26.07.2018)
- European Parliament – fighting terrorism with closed-door secrecy (07.02.2018
- Can we be sure EU terrorism policies respect human rights? (24.01.2018)
- Infographics: Legislative Procedure in the European Parliament
- Terrorism Directive: Document pool (24.11.2016)
Other:
- ICJ: European Union: independent judiciary and effective remedies must be at the core of the EU Regulation on “Terrorist Content Online (07.12.2020)
- Wikimedia, Upside-down: should all content be deemed terrorist until determined otherwise? (20.11.2020)
- HRW, Draft EU Regulation on ‘Terrorist Content’ Online Threatens Rights (16.11.2020)
- Open letter on behalf of civil society groups regarding the proposal for a Regulation on Terrorist Content Online (10.11.2020)
- UN Special Rapporteurs on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression and Spcial Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism (3.11.2020)
- Security Experts’ Letter on Transparency in Terrorist Content Regulation (15.06.2020)
- WITNESS brings together voices to push back on dangerous EU “Dissemination of Terrorist Content” proposal (September 2020)
- CDT and tech companies letter (21.09.2020)
- Article 19,s Comments on leaked draft Terrorist Content Regulation (03.2020)
- Digital Europe’s views on the Terrorist Content Online Regulation (24.10.2019)
- GSMA/ETNO Position paper on theproposal for a regulation on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online (July 2019)
- Internet Luminaries letter to MEPs on Regulation (02.04.2019)
- Daphne Keller, CIS Stanford: “Inception Impact Assessment: Measures to further improve the effectiveness of the fight against illegal content online” (03.2019)
- Daphne Keller, CIS Stanford:: “The EU’s Terrorist Content Regulation: Expanding the Rule of Platform Terms of Service and Exporting Expression Restrictions from the EU’s Most Conservative Member States” (25.03.2019)
- Mozilla Foundation fellow weighs in on flawed EU Terrorist Content regulation (13.02.2019)
- Daphne Keller, CIS Stanford:: “The CJEU’s new filtering case, the Terrorist Content Regulation, and the future of filtering mandates in the EU “ (02.12.2019)
- Fundamental Rights Agency Opinion on the Terrorist Content Regulation (12.02.2019)
- Civil society letter on the Terrorism Database (02.2019)
- The EU Regulation on Terrorist Content: An Emperor without Clothes (Martin Scheinin) (30.01.2019)
- Global Network Initiative’s Statement on the Terrorist Content Online Regulation (14.01.2019)
- Business Software Alliance’s position paper on the draft EU Regulation on Preventing the Dissemination of Terrorist Content Online (December 2018)
- Analysis from the UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression; the Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy and the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism (07.12.2018)
- Report: “The proposed Regulation on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online:safeguards and risksfor freedom of expression” by Dr. Aleksandra KuczerawyCentre for IT & IP Law (CiTiP), KU Leuven, Belgium (05.12.2018)
- CISPE –UPDATED text 26th November 20181CISPE suggested amendments regarding the scope of the Proposed Regulation on terrorist content online (26.11.2018)
- Report: New EU Proposal on the Prevention of Terrorist Content Online (Center for Internet and Society, Stanford University) (11.10.2018)
- Press Release: Commission announces the new Terrorist Content Regulation (12.09.2018)
Key Policy Makers:
- Committee responsible: LIBE Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
- Rapporteur: Patryk Jaki (Appointed 04/09/2019)
- Shadow Rapporteurs: Javier Zarzalejos (EPP), Marina Kaljurand (S&D), Maite Pagazaurtundua Ruiz (ALDE), Patrick Breyer(Greens/EFA), Cornelia Ernst (GUE/NGL)
Opinion Committees:
- IMCO Internal Market and Consumer Protection
- Rapporteur: Felix Reda (Greens/EFA)
- Shadow Rapporteurs: Eva Maydell (EPP), Lucy Anderson (S&D), Daniel Dalton (ECR), Jasenko Selimovic (ALDE)
- CULT Culture and Education
- Rapporteur: Julie Ward (S&D)
- Shadow Rapporteurs: Svetoslav Hristov Malinov (EPP), Yana Toom (ALDE), Martina Michels (GUE/NGL), Emma McClarkin (ECR)
Key Dates*:
*(note that these dates are TBC and subject to changes):
-
Approval in Plenary: 29 April 2021
-
- LIBE Committee (Lead Committee)
Deadline for Amendments: 15 FebruaryConsideration of AMs: 7 MarchShadow meetings: 5-6 March or 11-12 MarchDate updated on 29 March! Vote in LIBE Committee of the ReportVote in Plenary (1st reading): 15-18 April 2019Vote on provisional agreement with the Council: 11 January 2021
- CULT Committee
Consideration of Draft Opinion:; : 4 FebruaryDeadline for amendments: 6 FebruaryVote of the Opinion:11 March
- IMCO Committee
Consideration of Draft Report: 21 JanuaryDeadline for amendments: 23 January (noon)
Consideration of amendments: 20 FebruaryVote of the Opinion: 4 March
- LIBE Committee (Lead Committee)