Digital Services Act / Digital Markets Act: Document pool
The DSA-DMA package will affect how intermediaries regulate and influence user activity on their platforms, including people's ability to exercise their rights and freedoms online. It also aims at limiting the abuse of power by very large and gatekeeper platforms.
In her political guidelines, the President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen has committed to “upgrade the Union’s liability and safety rules for digital platforms, services and products, with a new Digital Services Act” (DSA). Later the Act was complemented to form a package with the Digital Markets Act (DMA). The DSA-DMA package will, among others, revise the rules contained in the E-Commerce Directive of 2000 that affect how intermediaries regulate and influence user activity on their platforms, including people’s ability to exercise their rights and freedoms online. This is why reforming those rules has the potential to be either a big threat to fundamental rights rights or a major improvement of the current situation online. It is also an opportunity for the European Union to decide how central aspects of the internet will look in the coming ten years.
A public consultation by the European Commission was launched in July 2020 and the legislative proposals were published on 15 December 2020. In addition, three different Committees of the European Parliament have adopted their Own Initiative Reports in view of setting the agenda of what the DSA-DMA package should regulate and how it should achieve its goals.
This Document Pool lists all relevant articles and documents related to the DSA and DMA. This will allow you to follow the developments of content moderation and regulatory actions in Europe.
Last update: 16 May 2022
Table of content
EDRi’s analysis and recommendations
Legislative documents
Blogposts and press releases
EDRi members’ publications
Other
Key policymakers
Key dates
EDRi’s analysis and recommendations
- Digital Services Act: The EDRi guide to 2,297 amendment proposals (26 November 2021)
- EDRi response to the European Commission’s public consultation (19 August 2020)
- EDRi Position Paper on the Digital Services Act: Platform Regulation Done Right (9 April 2020)
- Joint Report: Civil society calls for evidence-based solutions to disinformation (19 October 2018) with Access Now and Civil Liberties Union for Europe
- EDRi response to European Commission E-Commerce Directive Consultation (10 November 2010)
Legislative documents
European Commission
- Public consultation published in July 2020
- Legislative proposals published on 15 December 2020:
Council of the EU
- Council General Approach for the DSA (18 November 2021)
- Council General Approach for the DMA (16 November 2021)
European Parliament
- DSA position of the European Parliament (20 January 2022)
- DMA position of the European Parliament (15 December 2021)
Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee (IMCO)
- Reports on a Single Market For Digital Services (Digital Services Act)
- Reports on Contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act)
- Own Initiative Report: 2020/2018 (INL) Legislative initiative procedure – Digital Services Act: Improving the functioning of the Single Market – Draft
Legal Affairs Committee (JURI)
- Report on a Single Market For Digital Services (Digital Services Act)
- Reports on Contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act)
- Own Initiative Report: 2020/2019 (INL) Legislative initiative procedure – Digital Services Act: Adapting commercial and civil law rules for commercial entities operating online – Draft
Civil Liberties Committee (LIBE)
- Report on a Single Market For Digital Services (Digital Services Act)
- Draft Opinion by Patrick BREYER
- Final LIBE Opinion (28 July 2021) 💥
- Reports on Contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act)
- Draft Opinion by Ondřej KOVARIK
- Committee amendments
- Final LIBE Opinion
- Own Initiative Report: 2020/2022 (INI) Own-initiative report procedure – Digital Services Act and fundamental rights issues posed – Draft
EDRi’s blog posts and press releases
- EU negotiators approve good DSA, but more work is needed to build a better internet (25 April 2022)
- The Digital Markets Act promises to free people from digital walled gardens (25 March 2022)
- DMA: European Parliament takes first steps towards limiting gatekeeper power and providing real choices for people (15 December 2021)
- Has the Parliament effectively wielded the Digital Services Act to challenge platform power? The verdict is, somewhat (14 December 2021)
- Warning: the EU’s Digital Services Act could repeat TERREG’s mistakes (6 October 2021)
- DSA should tackle the root cause of polarisation, not just its symptoms (1 October 2021)
- A losing game: moderating online content fuels Big Tech power (29 September 2021)
- Move fast and break Big Tech’s power (8 September 2021)
- All hands on deck: What the European Parliament should do about the DSA (14 July 2021)
- Joint Civil Society Statement Urges IMCO Committee to Uphold Fundamental Rights in the DSA (1 July 2021)
- EDRi joins the Tracking-Free Ads Coalition in the European Parliament (16 June 2021)
- EDRi publishes new report: “How online ads discriminate” (16 June 2021)
- DSA should promote open and fair digital environment, not undermine the rule of law (8 June 2021)
- Dominant tech companies make their products incompatible deliberately (22 April 2021)
- Delete first, think later (24 March 2021)
- Targeted Online: How Big Tech’s business model sells your deepest secrets for profit (9 March 2021)
- Surveillance-based advertising: An industry broken by design and by default (9 March 2021)
- The Digital Markets Act must do more to protect end users’ rights (11 February 2021)
- The EU’s attempt to regulate Big Tech: What it brings and what is missing (18 December 2020)
- ‘A for effort’: European Commission DSA/DMA proposal falls short of the systemic change needed to rein in Big Tech power (15 December 2020)
- How the Parliament stakes out its DSA position (21 October 2020)
- Digital Services Act: what we learned about tackling the power of digital platforms (10 September 2020)
- The impact of competition law on your digital rights (19 February 2020)
- Online content moderation: Where does the Commission stand? (18 December 2019)
- Interoperability: A way to escape toxic online environments (04 December 2019)
- Content regulation – what’s the (online) harm? (9 October 2019)
- CJEU ruling on fighting defamation online could open the door for upload filters (4 October 2019)
- E-Commerce review: Safeguarding human rights when moderating online content (4 September 2019)
- E-Commerce review: Mitigating collateral damage (27 August 2019)
- E-Commerce review: Technology is the solution. What is the problem? (11 July 2019)
- E-Commerce review: Opening Pandora’s box? (20 June 2019)
- Fighting defamation online – AG Opinion forgets that context matters (19 June 2019)
- Answering guide for European Commission’s “illegal content consultation” (13 June 2018)
EDRi members’ publications
- Irish Council for Civil Liberties, The Biggest Data Breach: ICCL report on the scale of Real-Time Bidding data broadcasts in the U.S. and Europe (16 May 2022)
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), DSA Agreement: No Filternet, But Human Rights Concerns Remain (26 April 2022)
- Access Now: What’s next for the EU’s DSA? (21 February 2022)
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), DSA: EU Parliament Vote Ensures a Free Internet, But a Final Regulation Must Add Stronger Privacy Protections (20 January 2022)
- Privacy International’s recommendations for the trilogue on the Digital Markets Act (January 2022)
- ARTICLE 19, EU: Another missed opportunity to ensure a pluralistic digital ecosystem (14 December 2021)
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Digital Services Act: EU Parliament’s Key Committee Rejects a Filternet But Concerns Remain (14 December 2021)
- Access Now, Victories in the DSA vote: IMCO Committee puts people’s rights before corporate interest (14 December 2021)
- Access Now, The EU Digital Services Act won’t work without strong enforcement (9 December 2021)
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), EU Parliament Takes First Step Towards a Fair and Interoperable Market (23 November 2021)
- Amnesty International, Facebook Files: How a ban on surveillance advertising can fix Facebook (20 October 2021)
- Panoptykon Foundation, Algorithms of trauma: New case study shows that Facebook doesn’t give users real control over disturbing surveillance ads (6 October 2021)
- Panoptykon Foundation, Big Tech platforms are hurting us. 50 organisations urge the EU to #FixAlgorithms (22 September 2021)
- Bits Of Freedom, Facebook’s dominance makes it difficult to question the truth (8 September 2021)
- Panoptykon Foundation, Can the EU Digital Services Act contest the power of Big Tech’s algorithms? (2 August 2021)
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), DSA Proposal: Recommendations for the EU Parliament and Council (19 May 2021)
- Epicenter.works, FLoC: Google’s new means of following you across the web (19 May 2021)
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Digital Services Act Proposal: Recommendations for the EU Parliament and Council (6 May 2021)
- Bits Of Freedom, Four measures to limit the dominance of platforms like YouTube and Facebook (5 May 2021)
- Open Rights Group, AdTech is watching you! (5 May 2021)
- Access Now, Regulating online platforms: how EU Member States are undermining the Digital Services Act (22 April 2021)
- Wikimedia, Sanctioning the giants – will the internet be better with the Digital Markets Act? (31 March 2021)
- Privacy International, EU Digital Markets Act needs to be bolder to address data exploitation by digital gatekeepers (12 March 2021)
- ARTICLE 19, EU: More ambitious DMA needs to shape digital markets of our future (11 March 2021)
- Access Now, Why Facebook’s proposed hate speech policy on Zionism would only add fuel to the fire (10 March 2021)
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Privacy Without Monopoly: Data Protection and Interoperability (12 February 2021)
- ARTICLE 19, At a glance: Does the EU Digital Services Act protect freedom of expression? (11 February 2021)
- Access Now, Raising the alarm: online tracking harms human rights (14 December 2020)
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), EU vs Big Tech: Leaked Enforcement Plans and the Dutch-French Counterproposal (23 October 2020)
- ARTICLE 19, Response to the DSA consultation (16 October 2020)
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), EU Parliament Paves the Way for an Ambitious Internet Bill (21 October 2020)
- Access Now, Position on the Digital Services Act Package. Position paper series (15 October 2020)
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), EFF Responds to EU Commission on the Digital Services Act: Put Users Back in Control (4 September 2020)
- ARTICLE 19, Recommendations for the Digital Services Act (September 2020)
- Access Now, Guide: how to protect human rights in content governance (3 March 2020)
- Access Now, Can we rely on machines making decisions for us on illegal content? (26 February 2020)
- Access Now, Who should decide what we see online? (20 February 2020)
- Homo Digitalis, Shedding light on the Facebook content moderation centre in Athens (4 December 2019)
- Epicenter.works, Platform Regulation – an attempt at a fundamental rights based proposal
- Panoptykon, “SIN vs Facebook”: First victory against privatised censorship (17 July 2019)
- Panoptykon, SIN v Facebook: Tech giant sued over censorship in landmark case (8 May 2019)
- Panoptykon, Who (really) targets you? (29 April 2020)
- Bits of Freedom, You cannot post “a bag of bones” on Facebook (27 February 2019)
- Bits of Freedom, Women on Waves: How internet companies police our speech (29 August 2018)
Other
- The European Consumer Organisation (BEUC), EU proposals to shape the digital landscape, a step forward for consumers (22 February 2021)
- Amnesty International, Submission to the European Commission’s DSA Consultation (September 2020)
- The European Consumer Organisation (BEUC), Making the Digital Services Act work for consumers (30 April 2020)
- AWO, Research access to platform data (September 2022)
Key policymakers
Digital Services Act
- Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee (IMCO)
- Rapporteur: Christel SCHALDEMOSE (S&D)
- Shadow Rapporteurs: Arba KOKALARI (EPP), Dita CHARANZOVÁ (Renew), Alexandra GEESE (Greens), Alessandra BASSO (ID), Adam BIELAN (ECR), Martin SCHIRDEWAN (GUE)
- Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Committee (LIBE)
- Rapporteur: Patrick BREYER (Greens)
- Legal Affairs Committee (JURI)
- Rapporteur: Geoffroy DIDIER (EPP)
- Industry, Research and Energy Committee (ITRE)
- Rapporteur: Henna VIRKKUNEN (EPP)
Digital Markets Act
- Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee (IMCO)
- Rapporteur: Andreas SCHWAB (EPP)
- Shadow Rapporteurs: Evelyn GEBHARDT (S&D), Andrus ANSIP (Renew), Marcel KOLAJA (Greens), Virginie JORON (ID), Martin SCHIRDEWAN (GUE)
- Legal Affairs Committee (JURI)
- Rapporteur: Tiemo WÖLKEN (S&D)
- Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee (ECON)
- Rapporteur: Stéphanie YON-COURTIN (Renew)
- Industry, Research and Energy Committee (ITRE)
- Rapporteur: Carlos ZORRINHO (S&D)
Key dates (indicative)
- April 27, 2022: Final DSA trilogue meeting
- September 2022: DMA vote in EP plenary